I think I would take the introspection more seriously if the Time Lords didn't let him off the charges because he defused a bomb. Though, I will give you, that is all in the last episode which was written without knowledge of where the previous thirteen had been heading. It's possible Holmes and Saward's original ending would have paid off the introspection rather than hand-waving it away.
But it's the Master, isn't it, who reveals the cover-up by broadcasting the trial to the rest of Time Lord society in order to depose the High Council. The Valeyard's plan is to somehow get the Doctor's regenerations and then he randomly decides to blow everyone up because "catharsis of spurious morality" (obviously from a Doylist perspective that's all just there because the Bakers had no idea what the resolution was supposed to be and that allowed them to pull off the Doctor's exoneration in return for having saved the planet) - it doesn't really feel to me like the Valeyard is specifically going after the Time Lords though - as opposed to simply covering his tracks or blowing things up because he can (which I assume is what the spurious morality bit is about).
(no subject)
Date: 2019-05-29 11:21 am (UTC)But it's the Master, isn't it, who reveals the cover-up by broadcasting the trial to the rest of Time Lord society in order to depose the High Council. The Valeyard's plan is to somehow get the Doctor's regenerations and then he randomly decides to blow everyone up because "catharsis of spurious morality" (obviously from a Doylist perspective that's all just there because the Bakers had no idea what the resolution was supposed to be and that allowed them to pull off the Doctor's exoneration in return for having saved the planet) - it doesn't really feel to me like the Valeyard is specifically going after the Time Lords though - as opposed to simply covering his tracks or blowing things up because he can (which I assume is what the spurious morality bit is about).