Triassic sauropods are the best sauropods! The only triassic fossils I've found are Planolites but at least we know what they were formed by and their paleoecology.
B. did a bit of work on Argentinosaurus at one point - mostly, I think, trying not to let his skeptism about its size show (he thought there were some quite generous gaps in the way it was mounted).
Cretaceous dinos aren't my thing but, yes, Argentinosaurus is rather sparsely represented in fossil finds, and gentle skepticism rarely does any harm in science.
Size isn't everything. I like the Triassic weirdos, and evolutionary oddities generally.
The hip joint is the most important, followed by the knee joint and shape of leg bones; the pelvis and foot can also be helpful but are less conclusive. If you're curious, look at the study of stance in the hominid family tree, where it's a crucial factor; those sources often go into more detail than the ones for dinosaurs.
(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-13 08:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-14 04:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2025-06-14 06:14 pm (UTC)Size isn't everything. I like the Triassic weirdos, and evolutionary oddities generally.
Wow!
Date: 2025-06-13 09:16 pm (UTC)Re: Wow!
Date: 2025-06-14 04:44 pm (UTC)Re: Wow!
Date: 2025-06-14 08:15 pm (UTC)