Sleep No More
Nov. 26th, 2015 07:09 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It is funny how opinion can seem radically different even across fairly closely overlapping circles. This has been brought home to me a couple of times recently, firstly when
miss_s_b complained about everyone singing the praises of Julian Bleach's Davros while ignoring Michelle Gomez's Missy which was quite the opposite to what I was seeing (so much so, that I just had to go and look up who played Davros on Wikipedia). I was going to start this review by saying something along the lines of "I seem to be the only person who didn't much like Sleep No More" except that
sir_guinglain pretty much started his with the line "I seem to be the only person who liked Sleep No More".
It's a difficult story to get a good hold on. "None of this makes sense!" the Doctor cries at the end and, as the viewer, we are supposed to realise that the dots intentionally fail to join in a particularly coherent fashion. As an idea, this has potential and fits in neatly with the unreliable narrator and found footage ideas that the episode is also playing with. As an advantage these are not concepts Doctor Who has really played with before. However I felt the end result was ultimately too incoherent, even the bits that probably definitely did happen didn't quite seem to fit together.
I felt the episode also suffered, as 45 did, from failing to have the conviction of its own conceit. The reveal that some of the "footage" was actually from the viewpoint of the characters, was very cleverly done, but then widening that so that the cameras could be anywhere seemed to void the whole point of shooting as "found footage" in the first place. There was no found footage, scenes were constructed with a camera wherever the director wanted, and the episode cinematography actually had no constraints.
I think the biggest disappointment was the sand monsters though and I've been struggling to figure out why they don't work. An obvious contrast is the Weeping Angels where a number of disparate elements (eyes covered/don't blink, send you back in time, swift movement) have been blended together in a way that makes them appear a logical whole even though they are not. There is no reason, therefore, why throwing not-sleeping+sand-in-the-corner-of-your-eye+converts-people together shouldn't result in something equally effective but for some reason the end result is mostly ridiculous. Tame layman did a lot of snorting while the whole thing was rather inadequately explained. It also seems very odd that the key idea wasn't related to dreams or nightmares, that was basically what I was expecting and sentient sleep sand was always going to have to work hard to beat that kind of expectation.
I didn't like the Shakespeare quoting much either. I mean, Capaldi's great at that kind of thing but lengthy Shakespeare quotes make me think of mediocre fanfic. Just because you have sleep as a hook in your story (and not even, it transpired, a particularly thematically rich hook as far as the story was concerned) and Shakespeare has written things about sleep in prose that is more beautiful than anything you could write, doesn't actually make it a good idea to abdicate writing any words of your own so you can just dump some Shakespeare into things. I felt this scene typified what was wrong with the story, the writing and plot construction lacked the awareness of when a cute idea can't actually be sustained by the surrounding edifice.
I've maybe been a little harsh above and I've seen a lot worse Doctor Who in my time. But this was the weakest episode this season and ultimately I didn't think it was clever that it made no sense. I just thought it made no sense.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It's a difficult story to get a good hold on. "None of this makes sense!" the Doctor cries at the end and, as the viewer, we are supposed to realise that the dots intentionally fail to join in a particularly coherent fashion. As an idea, this has potential and fits in neatly with the unreliable narrator and found footage ideas that the episode is also playing with. As an advantage these are not concepts Doctor Who has really played with before. However I felt the end result was ultimately too incoherent, even the bits that probably definitely did happen didn't quite seem to fit together.
I felt the episode also suffered, as 45 did, from failing to have the conviction of its own conceit. The reveal that some of the "footage" was actually from the viewpoint of the characters, was very cleverly done, but then widening that so that the cameras could be anywhere seemed to void the whole point of shooting as "found footage" in the first place. There was no found footage, scenes were constructed with a camera wherever the director wanted, and the episode cinematography actually had no constraints.
I think the biggest disappointment was the sand monsters though and I've been struggling to figure out why they don't work. An obvious contrast is the Weeping Angels where a number of disparate elements (eyes covered/don't blink, send you back in time, swift movement) have been blended together in a way that makes them appear a logical whole even though they are not. There is no reason, therefore, why throwing not-sleeping+sand-in-the-corner-of-your-eye+converts-people together shouldn't result in something equally effective but for some reason the end result is mostly ridiculous. Tame layman did a lot of snorting while the whole thing was rather inadequately explained. It also seems very odd that the key idea wasn't related to dreams or nightmares, that was basically what I was expecting and sentient sleep sand was always going to have to work hard to beat that kind of expectation.
I didn't like the Shakespeare quoting much either. I mean, Capaldi's great at that kind of thing but lengthy Shakespeare quotes make me think of mediocre fanfic. Just because you have sleep as a hook in your story (and not even, it transpired, a particularly thematically rich hook as far as the story was concerned) and Shakespeare has written things about sleep in prose that is more beautiful than anything you could write, doesn't actually make it a good idea to abdicate writing any words of your own so you can just dump some Shakespeare into things. I felt this scene typified what was wrong with the story, the writing and plot construction lacked the awareness of when a cute idea can't actually be sustained by the surrounding edifice.
I've maybe been a little harsh above and I've seen a lot worse Doctor Who in my time. But this was the weakest episode this season and ultimately I didn't think it was clever that it made no sense. I just thought it made no sense.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-11-26 06:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-11-26 07:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-11-26 07:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-11-27 11:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-11-27 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-12-04 02:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-12-04 09:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-12-04 11:56 am (UTC)(1) A type of pod which has popped up already during this series.
(2) Ended "up in the air", making way for a sequel.
But I didn't find it intriguing at all. The had a bad feeling about the guy telling the story from the start so him very slowly dissolving at the end was "blah" if I can be so blunt.
Plus most of the elements that I manage to pick up on despite the bad lighting reminded me of previous Moffat episodes.
Night Terrors was more "interesting". At least that had some memorable quotes and a bit of humor. I wish Peter Capaldi was given better dialogue. I just focused on his acting in this.