Now if only that were actually true*.
I think they must actually mean they die before the age of X (for some age X) but they don't actually say that. Full article for those interested.
*Though I suppose it might be true if there were three times as many smokers as non-smokers.
I think they must actually mean they die before the age of X (for some age X) but they don't actually say that. Full article for those interested.
*Though I suppose it might be true if there were three times as many smokers as non-smokers.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-03-12 04:14 pm (UTC)I mean, I've even done it a couple of times myself, and I've never smoked...
(no subject)
Date: 2013-03-12 04:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-03-12 04:59 pm (UTC)A letter of mine once appeared in New Scientist, about differing mortality rates between men and women. Maybe I should write the equivalent for smokers ...
(no subject)
Date: 2013-03-14 01:48 pm (UTC)"A few months ago an eminent Swedish professor of statistics with a dry sense of humour made a television programme on statistics. In it, he pointed out that in Sweden, the average number of legs was 1.99 recurring, as some people had only one leg and others had none. This meant, he pointed out with a straight face, that in Sweden, the majority of the population had an above average number of legs."
(no subject)
Date: 2013-03-14 07:24 pm (UTC)