LinkedIn just sent me this headline as a link*. Now I assume that by "made up" they mean "does not appear in our authoritative dictionary of choice"**, but my immediate thought was to wonder how on Earth you could have a word (common or otherwise) that was not made up?
* I've no real idea why LinkedIn frequently emails me lists of apparently random links. I'm not even entirely sure why I have a LinkedIn account except that people kept sending me invites and in the end joining and making an account seemed like the path of least resistance.
** Article here - I've not read it so I've no idea if my supposition is correct.
* I've no real idea why LinkedIn frequently emails me lists of apparently random links. I'm not even entirely sure why I have a LinkedIn account except that people kept sending me invites and in the end joining and making an account seemed like the path of least resistance.
** Article here - I've not read it so I've no idea if my supposition is correct.
(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-08 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-08 05:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-08 06:29 pm (UTC)Doesn't stop me wincing at "thusly," though - even as I quite happily say things like "coolth."
(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-08 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-08 07:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-08 07:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-09 07:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-09 10:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-09 08:56 am (UTC)The comment on "Height" is rubbish. Is "height" not derived from "high", perhaps, rather than "tall"? I think the "th" has turned to "t" in general use because heighth" sounds too similar to "high"
(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-09 10:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-09 08:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-09 08:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2013-02-09 09:29 pm (UTC)That said, the list itself acknowledges that societal has specialist uses and yet still implies that it is "wrong" in some amorphous sense.