Oxygen

[purplecat]

Oxygen struck me as, structurally, being very similar to Knock! Knock! and, like Knock! Knock!, I feel I like it less than it deserves to be liked.

Both Oxygen and Knock! Knock! tell neatly self-contained stories. These are well-produced and acted with scripts that are thoughtful while fitting recognisably within the mould of a Doctor Who story. Fond as I am of the Sylvester McCoy era, it would have struggled to produce two stories of this high quality in close succession. In fact if these had appeared during a Sylvester McCoy season, I suspect I would have rated them as highly as stories like Ghost Light and Curse of Fenric.

This isn't a Sylvester McCoy season though, my expectations are different, and somehow neither managed to really grab me.

I don't really want to nit-pick at Oxygen, but among other things I'm dubious about the economics on display. I've mentioned a couple of times when discussing this season, about how you identify that point in a fantastical show, where it's breaking its own unstated rules of consistency. The problem Oxygen had for me specifically as someone who has hung around space scientists a bit, is that its very emphasis on the realities of surviving in a vacuum made me expect more realism from the rest of the Space Science. The reality of space is it is really, really expensive to put people up there (in weight terms, even if you're not factoring in the expense of training someone and are, apparently, discounting any value in human life) so you probably don't want them randomly suffocating even if they are not being as productive as you might like. This then, of course, made me think of the practices of Victorian factory owners and making your workers indebted to you for their use of oxygen (and thereby imposing a form of slavery) and that somehow seemed more plausible though not, obviously as likely to produce space zombies. Like the "how does agriculture work on Christmas?" problem I had with Matt Smith's final story, this distracted me far more than it should have done.

I'm not really qualified to comment on the depiction of disability. cosmolinguist has written eloquently about how hurtful she found it though I've seen other commentary that was cautiously optimistic or at least "jury still out" on the subject.

I was disappointed that the blue alien had no function in the story beyond making a simplistic point about racism and then dying.

Did I like anything about the story? Yes, actually. I really liked the interactions between Bill, Nardole and the Doctor. This is the first time we've seen them operating as a team and I liked the way the dynamic of two companions (who aren't romantically linked in any way) worked, particularly the way that the two of them can jointly put different perspectives to the Doctor. In fact I really like this softer version of the twelfth Doctor and both his new companions.

I did think the story was well-paced, well-acted and I liked that it was allowed to be about something and that its resolution tied back to its themes and the set up of the problem. I'm far from convinced it is really Oxygen's fault that I got distracted by picking holes.

Comments

[purplecat]

I actually liked this a lot, although no one I've spoken to seemed to like it as much.

That's interesting, most of the podcasts I've listened to have been really enthusiastic about it.

I had no idea Matt Lucas was Jewish - which just goes to show really. Certainly the tendency, particularly on the left, to conflate Judaism with Israel and Palestine with Islam has mixed with existing prejudices about Jewish financial power has led, as you say, to a tendency to assume that Jews fit into the Evil Patriarchal Imperialist Oppressors trope - though I have a feeling that Jewish voices have got better at pushing back against this in the past couple of years (but that may just be a subjective impression rather than anything real).

[daniel-saunders.livejournal.com]

It goes much further than the Arab-Israeli Conflict, though, although that makes things more complicated. When Auguste Bebel said in the nineteenth century that "Anti-Semitism is the Socialism of fools," he said it because left-wing antisemitism was so common, not because it was rare. Karl Marx was rabidly antisemitic despite (or perhaps because) he was Jewish. Even the idea common on the left that all wars are started by big business and high finance was originally that wars are started specifically by Jewish businessmen and financiers. And this has fed from the old Marxist left into the new identity politics left and is worse because whenever one raises the issue, the response is, "The left is anti-racist so it can't be antisemitic" and accusations of trying to cover-up supposed Israeli crimes.

I'm not convinced that Jews are any better at dealing with this now than previously. If anything a lot of left-of-centre Jews feel disenfranchised by current trends in left-wing parties, not wanting to vote for the right, but no longer feeling welcome on the left, particularly in Corbyn's Labour Party.

Sorry for going wildly off topic! Although maybe not so much, given the anti-capitalist nature of Oxygen.

[purplecat]

Corbyn's Labour seems to have a particular problem, but I'd say it was a problem that is pretty visible to non-Jews which I'm not sure it was back in the day which seems like progress of a kind.

[daniel-saunders.livejournal.com]

I hope you're right. Certainly the right-wing press has seized on it as another stick to beat Corbyn with, but I don't think there's any perception that this is a long-term structural problem on the left going back well over a century; the assumption seems more that it's something confined to Corbyn and Momentum or that it's an epiphenomenon of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, which is just another form of victim-blaming, given that the underlying assumption is that all of the blame for the Arab-Israeli Conflict lies with the Jews.