The Cost of Earning Extra Money
Mar. 9th, 2016 11:49 amLast year I helped judge one of the rounds of Google's Science Fair. Yay! For which they paid me. Frankly, not so Yay! Because HMRC. So in January I attempted to sign-up for Tax Self-Assessment. The website said it needed to send me registration code by mail, so I sighed, clicked the button and hoped it would reach me before the online self-assessment deadline. It didn't, though in the interim I was told that since I was paid in July 2015 I wouldn't actually need to fill in the online self-assessment until January 2017 - have no idea if this information was accurate or not.
About two weeks after the self-assessment deadline I get an email from HMRC saying they can't send me a code since they already sent me one in 2008 (when I also foolishly allowed someone to pay me a few hundred extra quid for something). Possibly fortunately I had kept records. About half-an-hour of going around in circles on the self-assessment website later I manage to create a new account (or possibly reactivate my old account or who knows?) only to be redirected to a self-assessment calculator thing which informed me that since I had earned under £2,500 and was otherwise in full-time employment paying tax via PAYE I shouldn't fill in a self-assessment but should instead phone the HMRC Tax Helpline and get them to reclaim the extra money by PAYE.
I did this, this morning. First I had to get through the voice recognition software that wanted me to explain my problem to it in simple terms. It would then tell me what it thought my problem was and I would disagree with it. In the end I told it I wanted to pay more tax, which seemed to get its attention. It read me a little information about what to do if I had been sent notification of an under-payment by HMRC, extracted my name, postcode and national insurance number, before eventually passing me on to someone who had as much difficulty understanding my accent as I did theirs. I explained I had earned extra money last year. They told me to fill in a self-assessment form. I told them that the self-assessment website had told me that the sum wasn't enough for self-assessment and should be included in my PAYE code. They asked me to repeat how much I had earned and then muttered for a bit, presumably inputting stuff into computers. Then they asked me what my annual salary was. Since Liverpool has just moved pay-slips online I then had to log into the Liverpool HR website and multiply my payslip by 12. They then checked the amount I had earned extra - which they had wrong, so I corrected them. Then they informed me that I owed an extra £90 in tax and that a new tax code would be sent to my employer.
I've agreed to judge for Google again this summer. I'm half tempted to waive the fee because paying tax on this sort of money is just as tortuous as I recall from last time around and I'm not sure it's worth the time and effort involved.
About two weeks after the self-assessment deadline I get an email from HMRC saying they can't send me a code since they already sent me one in 2008 (when I also foolishly allowed someone to pay me a few hundred extra quid for something). Possibly fortunately I had kept records. About half-an-hour of going around in circles on the self-assessment website later I manage to create a new account (or possibly reactivate my old account or who knows?) only to be redirected to a self-assessment calculator thing which informed me that since I had earned under £2,500 and was otherwise in full-time employment paying tax via PAYE I shouldn't fill in a self-assessment but should instead phone the HMRC Tax Helpline and get them to reclaim the extra money by PAYE.
I did this, this morning. First I had to get through the voice recognition software that wanted me to explain my problem to it in simple terms. It would then tell me what it thought my problem was and I would disagree with it. In the end I told it I wanted to pay more tax, which seemed to get its attention. It read me a little information about what to do if I had been sent notification of an under-payment by HMRC, extracted my name, postcode and national insurance number, before eventually passing me on to someone who had as much difficulty understanding my accent as I did theirs. I explained I had earned extra money last year. They told me to fill in a self-assessment form. I told them that the self-assessment website had told me that the sum wasn't enough for self-assessment and should be included in my PAYE code. They asked me to repeat how much I had earned and then muttered for a bit, presumably inputting stuff into computers. Then they asked me what my annual salary was. Since Liverpool has just moved pay-slips online I then had to log into the Liverpool HR website and multiply my payslip by 12. They then checked the amount I had earned extra - which they had wrong, so I corrected them. Then they informed me that I owed an extra £90 in tax and that a new tax code would be sent to my employer.
I've agreed to judge for Google again this summer. I'm half tempted to waive the fee because paying tax on this sort of money is just as tortuous as I recall from last time around and I'm not sure it's worth the time and effort involved.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:36 pm (UTC)Sadly the Google judging I do all takes place in a little room just looking at online submissions. The fun stuff happens at a later point as part of a big hoopla in Mountain View. I had a lot of fun doing some judging for the First Lego League a couple of weeks ago though, and that involved actually meeting the participants and talking to them about their robots. FLL only paid expenses so I don't have to worry about the tax implications either!
(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 12:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 01:42 pm (UTC)"Please state the station you are travelling from"
"Oxford"
"Uxbridge. Is this correct?"
"No. OxFORD."
"Uxbridge. Is this correct?"
"OXford"
"Uxbridge. Is this correct?"
"OXferd"
"Uxbridge. Is this correct?"
"Orchsforrrrd"
"Uxbridge. Is this correct?"
*gentle weeping*
Could you ask that the fee goes to a charity of your choice?
(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:27 pm (UTC)Could you ask that the fee goes to a charity of your choice? This would be tempting had
(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 02:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 07:47 pm (UTC)It's the sort of thing that's perfectly feasible when you're working in many countries, and can choose which country to base which operation in. It's quite simple, really: I could run you through the important aspects of minimising your UK tax liability in that sort of situation in a brief meeting, and could give you proper advice on it for single thousands, rather than hundreds of the things. The media have massively over-hyped this, in my (professional) opinion.
But yes, they are strict about accounting for stuff properly :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:34 pm (UTC)If Liverpool had some similar scheme, that might be more worthwhile than the hassle over taxes for the money in your personal pocket.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-09 03:41 pm (UTC)Mind you, I'd have to time it so the money came in after the summer zeroing of accounts, not before!
(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-10 12:37 am (UTC)As I was leaving, they seemed to lose the plot, though, and started whittling away at the scheme. In particular they started to cover un-funded EU project taxes from the fund, including not only money contributed from that grant (one of the nice things was that a small proportion of overheads for most external grants would flow into the fund) but all the money in that. Those with large EU projects would then find themselves with nothing left, ever.
(no subject)
Date: 2016-03-10 05:05 am (UTC)A letter is totally the way to go. I keep a template letter handy :)
Work from home
Date: 2018-11-15 09:40 am (UTC)http://www.clixsense.com/?8172285