The Randomizer: The Daemons
Jan. 29th, 2015 05:50 pmWe actually watched this before Genesis of the Daleks, I just forgot about it. How could I forget The Daemons?. I blame Christmas.
The Daemons is often held up as the quintessential "Unit Family" story which feels a little odd to me. I've not watched a lot of Pertwee, so maybe I'll change my opinion, but it doesn't feel entirely typical of the era.
The most obvious problem with the "UNIT Family" idea is that the Brigadier spends most of the story stuck on the opposite side of a heat barrier to everyone else. While this gives Yates and Benton a chance to shine it doesn't feel like you could really describe a story as a great UNIT family story if the key family member isn't there most of the time.
The Daemons is also working very hard to both have its cake and eat it when it comes to depicting magic in Doctor Who. It mostly succeeds at this. It wheels out the idea of "sufficiently advanced technology" but backs it up with a number of examples, The Doctor's remote control of Bessie, the forcefield that appears to beat people up in the crypt where we understand how the illusion of magic is achieved either completely (the remote control) or partially (we understand the concept of a forcefield as a technological thing rather than a magical thing). I was discussing with
parrot_knight in the comments on Time and the Rani how the Baker's "research" into the science completely failed to translate into anything interesting on screen. Here the idea of the equivalence between mass and energy is used very nicely to tie the Daemon's change in size with extremes of heat and cold, wrapping several apparently supernatural phenomena nicely together into a neat pseudo-scientific package. Where The Daemons succeeds less well is in the notion that chanting and ritual somehow genuinely generate physical effects through hand wave-sufficiently-advanced-science. Doctor Who has gone on to play with ideas of mathematics having genuine power (Logopolis) and words having genuine power (The Shakespeare Code) which one feels might have helped round out the idea of the Daemon's technology.
Jo's turn as potential sacrificial victim is also ill-explained and, in many ways, harks forward to Sarah's tendency to end up as a potential sacrifice rather than being something particularly essential to the Pertwee era. In fact The Daemons definitely has a touch of the gothic which is more Hinchcliffe than Letts, whose stories tended to be more interested in bureaucracies, both civil and military, and their interactions.
Much has also been made - or at least it was when I was a teenage fan, getting all my information via Doctor Who Monthly and the Celestial Toyroom - of the fact that Benton and Yates appear here in civvies. That is actually very odd because they are manifestly on duty, and in fact, know they will be on duty when they set out (in their uniforms) to commandeer a helicopter. Tame layman also had cause to remark that all these trained soldiers seemed to fare rather badly in hand-to-hand combat with any sufficiently determined villager.
Bok has not aged well as a special effect, which is a huge shame given the iconic place of "Chap with wings, five rounds rapid!" in Who fandom. I also personally find Miss Hawthorne (the local white witch) very irritating. I think she's supposed to be a forceful battle-axe, but the performance somehow makes me think of a flighty and slightly irritating busy-body.
I'm mostly nitpicking though. There is a great deal to like in The Daemons and it is almost a text-book case of how to invoke the idea that sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic by showing the viewer how that works, rather than simply announcing something is technology and then having it behave just like magic.
The Daemons is often held up as the quintessential "Unit Family" story which feels a little odd to me. I've not watched a lot of Pertwee, so maybe I'll change my opinion, but it doesn't feel entirely typical of the era.
The most obvious problem with the "UNIT Family" idea is that the Brigadier spends most of the story stuck on the opposite side of a heat barrier to everyone else. While this gives Yates and Benton a chance to shine it doesn't feel like you could really describe a story as a great UNIT family story if the key family member isn't there most of the time.
The Daemons is also working very hard to both have its cake and eat it when it comes to depicting magic in Doctor Who. It mostly succeeds at this. It wheels out the idea of "sufficiently advanced technology" but backs it up with a number of examples, The Doctor's remote control of Bessie, the forcefield that appears to beat people up in the crypt where we understand how the illusion of magic is achieved either completely (the remote control) or partially (we understand the concept of a forcefield as a technological thing rather than a magical thing). I was discussing with
Jo's turn as potential sacrificial victim is also ill-explained and, in many ways, harks forward to Sarah's tendency to end up as a potential sacrifice rather than being something particularly essential to the Pertwee era. In fact The Daemons definitely has a touch of the gothic which is more Hinchcliffe than Letts, whose stories tended to be more interested in bureaucracies, both civil and military, and their interactions.
Much has also been made - or at least it was when I was a teenage fan, getting all my information via Doctor Who Monthly and the Celestial Toyroom - of the fact that Benton and Yates appear here in civvies. That is actually very odd because they are manifestly on duty, and in fact, know they will be on duty when they set out (in their uniforms) to commandeer a helicopter. Tame layman also had cause to remark that all these trained soldiers seemed to fare rather badly in hand-to-hand combat with any sufficiently determined villager.
Bok has not aged well as a special effect, which is a huge shame given the iconic place of "Chap with wings, five rounds rapid!" in Who fandom. I also personally find Miss Hawthorne (the local white witch) very irritating. I think she's supposed to be a forceful battle-axe, but the performance somehow makes me think of a flighty and slightly irritating busy-body.
I'm mostly nitpicking though. There is a great deal to like in The Daemons and it is almost a text-book case of how to invoke the idea that sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic by showing the viewer how that works, rather than simply announcing something is technology and then having it behave just like magic.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-29 06:27 pm (UTC)/nitpicking myself
(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-29 06:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 02:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-29 06:51 pm (UTC)Benton and Yates appear here in civvies. That is actually very odd because they are manifestly on duty
I've thought this too. Bear in mind that discipline in UNIT is very lax, with non-regulation haircuts and people often getting away with backchatting to their superior officers.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-29 06:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-29 07:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-29 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-29 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 02:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 02:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 12:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 01:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-29 06:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 02:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 12:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 01:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 02:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 05:07 pm (UTC)It's much easier to see a clear style for his script editors, and those are so very different it is difficult to tease out an underlying JNT style.
(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 05:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 02:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2015-01-30 12:52 pm (UTC)