All I can answer to this really is that the essays certainly seemed to consider Mal as, potentially, a libertarian hero and the South defeat of the South as a defeat for libertarianism. Even allowing the Civil War to have been caused by a complex set of factors, 30% of the population of the South were slaves and I don't see that the South's libertarian credentials were doing much for those people. If libertarianism wants to vindicate the South then it needs to explain how libertarianism would have brought freedom to the slaves or it needs to reject the South as some kind of last gasp libertarian cause.
I also love The Lion, the With and the Wardrobe but that doesn't stop me being uncomfortable with some of the ways it acts as a christian apologia, and some of the attitudes it tacitly vindicates by making its allegorically christian protagonists a good deal nicer and more sympathetic than many christians have en masse, historically, been. I also think, from a Christian perspective, it wraps up a number of attitudes which probably are not particularly Christian into the allegory and thus, to a certain extent, tars Christianity with the brush of some of Lewis' own prejudices.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-12-07 03:54 pm (UTC)I also love The Lion, the With and the Wardrobe but that doesn't stop me being uncomfortable with some of the ways it acts as a christian apologia, and some of the attitudes it tacitly vindicates by making its allegorically christian protagonists a good deal nicer and more sympathetic than many christians have en masse, historically, been. I also think, from a Christian perspective, it wraps up a number of attitudes which probably are not particularly Christian into the allegory and thus, to a certain extent, tars Christianity with the brush of some of Lewis' own prejudices.