Mary CLARKE
Jan. 19th, 2008 09:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dear Genealogist
When you contact me because you have a "hot match" in your family tree for a Mary CLARKE b. 1862 in my tree and, despite the fact the only evidence of a connection is the name (not exactly an unusual one) and the date of birth and you think your Mary Clarke was born in New bl**dy South bl**dy Wales and I think mine was born in Huntingdon, as I say despite the fact you are obviously off on a wild goose chase I have the courtesy to email you the relevant census images since, you never know, one day a piece of the puzzle might fall into place that does make a link (she wasn't direct line, I didn't know where she went after she left home, she could have gone to Australia), I do not expect to get a pompous email message back telling me there isn't a link (well doh!) which makes it clear you have mistaken her for her mother on the census images and then giving me a lecture on how to name people correctly in my family tree, which actually I have done, and complaining that I've wasted your time on a wild goose chase of a hot match. Sheesh! all you had to do was read a couple of emails, I had to go to the trouble of working out what were the relevant source scans to send, locating them in my filing system and attaching to an email - only 10 minutes work but I bet it was 10 minutes more than you bothered to put in. And I mean Mary Clarke, New South Wales - Mary Clarke, Huntingon - in what world was this not likely to turn out to be a wild goose chase?
EDIT: Nor do I expect to get further correspondence asking me to repeat myself and addressing me as Bryan (?!?!?!)