NuWho Rewatch: Turn Left
Mar. 18th, 2015 09:30 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Another pessimistic view of human nature follows hot on the last.
I wonder if it was deliberate to have two such downbeat tales before the big finale. This lacks the punch of Midnight and seems, in a way, less bleak even though it is operating on a far larger scale. I suspect there are several reasons. There is the "sliding doors" premise and the appearance of Rose, both of which serve as distractions from the grimness of the tale and certainly serve as distractions from the extent to which humans are creating the misery depicted. There is also the fact that the ugliness here is institutionalised, and we are used to seeing institutionalised oppression in Doctor Who in a way we are not used to seeing it on the individual level such as was shown in Midnight. Lastly, Midnight essentially ends in failure where, although Donna dies, Turn Left ends in a success.
It's a still a bleak story and reminds me a little of some of the John Wyndam and John Christopher books I read when younger - particularly The Kraken Wakes from the former and The Death of Grass from the latter, in which society quietly buckles and falls apart under some external pressure.
It's a good story by its own lights, but it is hard to ignore the fact that the premise is a well-known trope, and the signifiers used for a dystopian future - internment camps, cramped living conditions, refugees, people wearing brown - are also all pretty standard. Its the sort of thing that can seem fresh and exciting the first time you come across it and to be fair it nearly always serves as a decent vehicle for a show to do something a bit different and interesting. However its difficult to feel Davies is actually doing anything particularly interesting with the premise. He hasn't got the space to do any serious world-building and so is relying on emotive images and the audience's imaginations to fill in the gaps. The world without the Doctor is pretty grim, but that isn't much of a surprise given the programme is called Doctor Who. It's interesting to contrast with Buffy, the Vampire Slayer's "what if Buffy never went to Sunnydale" episode which doesn't attempt to replay the previous seasons' key moments but plunges the viewer immediately into the current dystopia and tells its story there. In some ways Turn Left's ability to actually tell a story in the time available is hampered by the re-run of the Earth-bound stories of seasons 3 and 4.
I also found Rose hard to get a grip on. I think Billie Piper has said she found reviving the character for this episode difficult and I think her unease shows, but I think part of the problem is the script which gives us a grim, semi-omniscient, part of the establishment Rose which is a long, long way from the Rose that we knew in seasons 1 and 2.
This has ended up a fairly negative review which isn't really justified because I like this story. It's even a bit of a relief after Midnight! It's just that taking a step away from it, it feels like it is simply doing the obvious things and is too constrained either by its length, or maybe the replay format, to really tell its own story.
I wonder if it was deliberate to have two such downbeat tales before the big finale. This lacks the punch of Midnight and seems, in a way, less bleak even though it is operating on a far larger scale. I suspect there are several reasons. There is the "sliding doors" premise and the appearance of Rose, both of which serve as distractions from the grimness of the tale and certainly serve as distractions from the extent to which humans are creating the misery depicted. There is also the fact that the ugliness here is institutionalised, and we are used to seeing institutionalised oppression in Doctor Who in a way we are not used to seeing it on the individual level such as was shown in Midnight. Lastly, Midnight essentially ends in failure where, although Donna dies, Turn Left ends in a success.
It's a still a bleak story and reminds me a little of some of the John Wyndam and John Christopher books I read when younger - particularly The Kraken Wakes from the former and The Death of Grass from the latter, in which society quietly buckles and falls apart under some external pressure.
It's a good story by its own lights, but it is hard to ignore the fact that the premise is a well-known trope, and the signifiers used for a dystopian future - internment camps, cramped living conditions, refugees, people wearing brown - are also all pretty standard. Its the sort of thing that can seem fresh and exciting the first time you come across it and to be fair it nearly always serves as a decent vehicle for a show to do something a bit different and interesting. However its difficult to feel Davies is actually doing anything particularly interesting with the premise. He hasn't got the space to do any serious world-building and so is relying on emotive images and the audience's imaginations to fill in the gaps. The world without the Doctor is pretty grim, but that isn't much of a surprise given the programme is called Doctor Who. It's interesting to contrast with Buffy, the Vampire Slayer's "what if Buffy never went to Sunnydale" episode which doesn't attempt to replay the previous seasons' key moments but plunges the viewer immediately into the current dystopia and tells its story there. In some ways Turn Left's ability to actually tell a story in the time available is hampered by the re-run of the Earth-bound stories of seasons 3 and 4.
I also found Rose hard to get a grip on. I think Billie Piper has said she found reviving the character for this episode difficult and I think her unease shows, but I think part of the problem is the script which gives us a grim, semi-omniscient, part of the establishment Rose which is a long, long way from the Rose that we knew in seasons 1 and 2.
This has ended up a fairly negative review which isn't really justified because I like this story. It's even a bit of a relief after Midnight! It's just that taking a step away from it, it feels like it is simply doing the obvious things and is too constrained either by its length, or maybe the replay format, to really tell its own story.