Entry tags:
Testing
Since crossposting to LJ has gone fubar on my other journal.
I'm also, once again, not receiving comment notifications from
louisedennis.
EDIT: Well that would seem to confirm it, can no longer crosspost to LJ from either of my accounts.
I'm also, once again, not receiving comment notifications from
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
EDIT: Well that would seem to confirm it, can no longer crosspost to LJ from either of my accounts.
no subject
It's not just DW it's fubared - it's broken all sorts of third party login clients, and there's a lot of ranting on the lj-release comm over on LJ. Not to mention the whole massive security breach it resulted in, which LJ have now dismissed as being 'minor'. After the rollout, a lot of people, when they went to check their inbox or edit entries, were shown the cache (LJ says 'cache' and therefore wouldn't have been able to edit anything) of the last person to use the page. Which meant, of course, they could see messages in the inbox and locked entries they weren't supposed to have access to.
LJ said this only lasted 3 minutes, but the reports that rolled in from users suggest it was/is more widespread.
no subject
What's more I am yet again failing to receive comment notifications from
All minor stuff but I do wonder exactly who it is they get to test these releases.
no subject
Wait. Are you supposed to test these things before you roll them out? [/sarcasm]
I'll say one thing for Dreamwidth - they give code tours in advance and before they roll stuff out.
However, the bug on AO3 seems now to be fixed, since my fic is finally marked as complete. I'm sure you were really worried about it ::g::
no subject
I can sort of see why these problems might not have been picked up in testing, though it does suggest they are not very serious about third party developers (which I suppose is fair enough, Google isn't either), but the problems with the RTF editor and the last release are seriously WTF? I don't use the RTF editor, but having had to help a couple of users out of the mangling it did on their entries it boggles my mind that anyone could have tested it at all without realising it was seriously fubar.
LJ users who claim we're all being too demanding and these things happen are also starting to seriously piss me off. Yes bugs get through testing, but the increasing frequency with which they get through LJ's testing suggests that they aren't even attempting a minimum standard for software quality. As you say DreamWidth provides a much better model for how user expectations can be managed, and how to deal with bugs when they inevitably appear, though whether they could maintain that in the face of a userbase LJ's size is a moot point.
no subject
http://dw-maintenance.dreamwidth.org/38097.html
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject