purplecat: Hand Drawn picture of a Toy Cat (Default)
purplecat ([personal profile] purplecat) wrote2012-11-15 05:53 pm

PCC Elections

Just got back from spoiling my ballot paper, following carefully the instructions* provided by [personal profile] spiralsheep.

I don't particularly object to the PCCs themselves, accepting the argument that senior police officers have been playing politics without accountability for pretty much as long as there have been senior police officers. However I do strongly object to the barriers that were placed in the way of candidates making their positions known to the electorate. I actually visited the official website where it was clear that the candidates in my area had been told they only had 500 words in which to state their case. Oddly enough they were all hoping to minimize the impact of budget cuts on policing (a non-policy since I can't imagine any candidate seriously putting forward a policy of maximizing the impact of budget cuts on policing).

While there are evils associated with unregulated campaigning, at 500 words it seems people have little choice except to vote according to party ideology which is, I believe, the opposite of the stated intention of these elections.

*There seems something terribly British and middle-class about needing instructions for spoiling a ballot paper.
ext_189645: (Logres)

[identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com 2012-11-15 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree - it would not be good if internet was the only medium.

Our local radio is usually chronically short of content, and I understand has staged several debates with candidates - although I don't know how effective they were, as I only heard about them on Twitter. Still, they did happen.

It's probably more difficult in areas with more actual news :-D