While I know a lot of people disagree with me, I do think Chibnall's style is much closer to Davies' than it is to Moffat's. Going out on a limb, I also think that Chibnall is deliberately trying to produce something more like Davies' era than Moffat's just... too much of this feels to me like Chibnall trying to recreate the hits from the Ninth and Tenth Doctor eras as he recalls them.
maybe... I should just sit through this series without sharing my views
I guess that depends upon the purpose of sharing. Expressing views promotes interaction and discussion and, if you think your opinions may change, could serve as a potential record of interest.
I do think there is a difference between reviewers who give the impression that it is somehow a personal flaw to like something they dislike, as opposed to reviewers who seem much better able to express that they personally didn't like something and to express why without it coming across as an attempt to spoil the enjoyment of someone who did. It's a difficult line to tread though, since there is an art in producing a good ranting piece of invective and you really can't do that without implying there is something objective about your opinion - though I think things can also be objectively bad and enjoyable, in fact I think quite a bit of Fugitive of the Judoon is objectively bad but I can also see why lots of people love it anyway. I think that would be my concern if I really wasn't enjoying a series of Doctor Who at all but continuing to review - that my reviews would just become this source of negativity that made all the readers unhappy.
no subject
maybe... I should just sit through this series without sharing my views
I guess that depends upon the purpose of sharing. Expressing views promotes interaction and discussion and, if you think your opinions may change, could serve as a potential record of interest.
I do think there is a difference between reviewers who give the impression that it is somehow a personal flaw to like something they dislike, as opposed to reviewers who seem much better able to express that they personally didn't like something and to express why without it coming across as an attempt to spoil the enjoyment of someone who did. It's a difficult line to tread though, since there is an art in producing a good ranting piece of invective and you really can't do that without implying there is something objective about your opinion - though I think things can also be objectively bad and enjoyable, in fact I think quite a bit of Fugitive of the Judoon is objectively bad but I can also see why lots of people love it anyway. I think that would be my concern if I really wasn't enjoying a series of Doctor Who at all but continuing to review - that my reviews would just become this source of negativity that made all the readers unhappy.