ext_189645: (0)
bunn ([identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] purplecat 2008-07-07 09:15 pm (UTC)

You've only listed the recurring monsters in the new series, but as we've only had 4 years of the new series, is this not a little unfair? The old series monsters have had longer to recur in, haven't they?

There are quite a lot of monsters that have only appeared once in the new series - if in the next series, say we had more Gelth or Krilitane or Sycorax or whatever, would they not then become recurring monsters, or am I missing something in your definition of recurring?

I felt some of the later 'classic' Dalek stories made them far too wimpy and easy to defeat, one of the things I liked about the new series Daleks was I thought they did a good job of making them properly scary again.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org